patching...
Welcome back, Patch Blogger!

Bring A Brown Bag—Some Hoboken Mothers Unhappy With School Lunch

Mothers are taking action after seeing a close-up of their children's lunch

 

First Lady Michelle Obama has made it one of her top priorities. Celebrity Chef Jamie Oliver is devoting a television show to it. And now, Hoboken mothers are speaking up about it too: school lunch. 

A couple of weeks ago, Peta Moran—mother of a 5-year-old who is enrolled in the St. Francis Early Childhood Center on 310 Jefferson St.—noticed that her daughter Olivia was hungry when she picked her up from school. Olivia told her mom that she didn't like the school lunches and that she wasn't getting any fresh fruits or vegetables.

A little bit concerned, Moran, 33, decided to check out the school lunch for herself. Since that first day (on March 15), she has been going to lunch at the pre-K program every day, taking photos and publishing them on her blog EatHoboken.

"It was worse than I thought it was," Moran said. 

On one of the first days she checked out the lunch, she found the children were eating chicken nuggets. Upon a closer look, she noticed blue spots on the nugget. Moran, fearing that the nuggets were moldy, asked the food director, who assured her it wasn't mold, but stains from the pan. But the thought of the children eating teflon didn't make her feel much better, Moran said. 

The food the children at St. Francis are eating is prepared by Chartwells, a food provider that serves academic communities. The food is prepared locally, mainly in two big kitchens—one in Hoboken High School and one in Wallace Primary School, said Chartwells' Hoboken Food Director Sean Walsh. Some of the food is also prepared in the kitchens of individual Hoboken schools, Walsh said.

Because St. Francis is a small school with limited facilities, the food is brought in from the other kitchens in town. 

Walsh—who has been working in Hoboken for three months, but for Chartwells for the past 10 years—said he is aware of Moran's blog, but didn't want to comment on it. He said that Chartwells always "meets and exceeds" USDA School Meal standards. 

"We're always looking to improve what we're doing," Walsh said.

He said he prepared a statement to be put on the Hoboken Board of Education's Web site, explaining Chartwells' commitment to providing healthy, balanced meals for children. The statement also read that Chartwells promotes dialogue and encourages feedback (the statement had not been published on the Web site as of Wednesday afternoon.)

After seeing Moran's photos, not only did Hoboken mothers Vanessa Falco and Rachel Bucci decide to no longer buy their children school lunches, they revived an existing business plan. 

Together they are forming Time For Nutrition, LLC, a service that delivers packed lunches to children in schools. Parents can order from a menu for about $5 a day (school lunch from Chartwells is $2.75 a day). The meals are then delivered to the different public schools for the kids to eat at lunch time. All food will be natural and some of it will be organic, said Bucci, 28. 

"This will be an added service where parents are able to select our lunch if they're not satisfied (with the current school lunch), which we believe they are not," said Falco, 39. Falco has two children in the Hoboken public school system. 

Moran said she sat down with the children at St. Francis last Friday, to partake in "Pizza Friday," and eat the lunch herself. The menu had improved from the prior week, she said, and included a salad of mixed greens with tomatoes, a slice of pizza and a small carton of milk. Some other dishes include: breakfast for lunch (pancakes and eggs); Philly cheesesteak sandwich (which Moran described as a "Philly Cheese Mystery Meat sandwich") and chicken parm with pasta. 

According to Hoboken-based nutritionist Inna Topiler, children's lunches shouldn't be too heavy on carbohydrates. Carbs become sugar, which cause so-called sugar highs. Once that high wears out, Topiler explained, the children crash. Too much sugar can also result in high blood pressure and behavioral problems, Topiler said. Meat should always be white meat, rather than "mystery meat," explained Topiler, who has been a nutritionist in Hoboken for five years. 

A healthy lunch for a child should be around 300 calories, and has to be a healthy mixture of protein (egg or chicken), carbohydrates (whole wheat pasta or brown rice), vegetables and "good fat," such as olive oil. 

Topiler recommended that the children drink watered-down juice with their lunch, or water. Sometimes the lunch includes skim chocolate milk. Although that milk includes less fat than regular chocolate milk, it actually has more sugar to make it taste better (things don't taste as good once the fat is taken out, Topiler said).

Fresh fruit is also allowed, but fruit from a can—often in sugary syrup—isn't good for the children, Topiler said. There is a fruitbowl with fresh fruit available at St. Francis. On at least one day last week, the children ate fruit from a can. 

Moran said that one day the children got half an orange, still in the peel—which made it hard for them to eat. 

Moran, whose photos appeared on CNN's "Anderson Cooper 360º" last week, said her goal is to raise awareness and make sure a wellness committee, in charge of nutrition and education about healthy foods, is established. She said she could not find a wellness committee or policy listed on the Board of Education's Web site. 

Moran said she e-mailed Superintendent Peter Carter and all nine members of the Board of Education on March 24, but didn't receive any answer. 

"My wish is for all children to have access to the opportunity to live a healthy life, which is why a Wellness committee is so crucial," Moran wrote. 

Falco and Bucci said they will have their lunch service up and running by September. They said they are hoping for the public schools' cooperation. 

"A child who's had a healthy lunch will perform better," said Bucci. Bucci's 5-year-old is currently enrolled at St. Francis (the same school where Moran has been taking photos of the lunches). Come September, her 3-year-old son will also be going into the Hoboken public school system. 

"It's a win-win situation," Bucci said. "Hopefully the schools will see that."

Cliché

11:28 am on Thursday, April 1, 2010

A "win-win" situation would be an overhaul of the school lunch system, not a private company providing bagged lunches at almost twice the rate the school charges. Obviously, not everyone in this town can afford $25 a week to pay someone to make their child's lunch. Think about the students who receive lunch at a free or reduced rate.
I am sure there heart is in the right place, so I am not going to accuse the two mothers of trying to make a quick buck at the expense of our kids, (as I am sure the overhead of such a venture will probably eat up a good portion of whatever money they do make), but I am also not going to give them accolades either.
I do however applaud Peta for shedding light on just what the children of Hoboken are being fed, and hope to see more join her cause in an activist role for real change.
At the end of the day, "Time for Nutrition" is just another example of the divide between the people who make up this town. The children of "affluent" ( a FAVORITE word of one of your writers) parents may benefit from a service such as this, but many kids will still be stuck eating loads of carbs and "mystery meat." If we get more people like Peta angry and involved however, this does not have to be the case.

Reply
Comment_arrow

hullabaloo

2:56 pm on Thursday, April 1, 2010

Well said Cliche. The expose is "food for thought" but an expensive private catering option will not address the problem for the majority of students or put pressure on Chartwell's to improve. As a family that "brown-bags" lunch from home I still find half-eaten or entirely uneaten lunches at the end of some school days (and this despite involving everyone in their lunch choices). As any parent knows what was a good idea for lunch in the morning may change by lunchtime and the timing itself of lunch may affect a child's appetite. Healthy food choices should be the goal: for everyone.

stephanie

2:51 am on Friday, April 2, 2010

HI, i wish this issue is addressed as soon as possible my niece has a liver problem and can't have any fatty or sugar food for her diet she just started in public school and has gain 12lbs since the beginning of the school year. If this town worried about the schools as much as they due about building condos which are over priced and making this city over crowed. There would be the best lunch program ever.

Reply
Comment_arrow

4321

10:56 am on Friday, April 2, 2010

If it were not for those condos, there would be no Hoboken Patch, no HobokenNow and…hmmmm…come to think about it, no Hoboken411 – I kind of like the idea of that one.

Anyway, I am not saying that there is nothing wrong with school food but this topic is as old as the public school system. What’s next, a movement to put 12 hotdog buns into a package?

p1ywood

3:45 pm on Friday, April 2, 2010

I think it's great that Moran, Falco and Bucci are creating a viable alternative to the sad state of school lunches. I think if they were in it for the money they could find something easier, so I don't think that's the motivation! Change is hard but someone has to step up to the plate and I am glad they are. It makes sense to get something up and running and then try to get the efficiencies of scale to kick in and bring costs down or maybe the people who now manage the school lunches AND breakfasts (don't get me started on the breakfasts) will take a hint and start re-thinking what is going on. Those who complain that "not everyone can afford it" should lighten up.

Reply

Cliché

4:47 pm on Friday, April 2, 2010

First of all, if you actually read my comment, you would see that I specifically said I do not think Falco and Bucci are in it for the money. I can see your argument that having alternatives *may* cause Chartwells (the company that provides the "food" that is served in our schools) to rethink what they serve (though I doubt it). However, to suggest that I, or hullabaloo for that matter, need to "lighten up" because we are concerned about the less fortunate children in this town, is catty, and does nothing to move the conversation forward.
The school lunch program needs to be completely rebuilt to benefit all students, regardless of their family's income. That isn't going to happen by providing $5 gourmet lunches. If I am uptight because I feel that all the children in this town deserve a nutritious lunch (and breakfast), so f@*king be it.

Reply

p1ywood

5:25 pm on Friday, April 2, 2010

Yes, I did actually read your comment and sorry if I offended you. I was actually agreeing with you on profit not being the motive in the nutritious lunch venture. I applaud these parents stepping in and making an effort to improve things, and I can see why they might conclude to configure it in such a way as they have. At least this way the results are immediate albeit only for those who can afford it, and it is a positive trend in what is being served up at the schools. It is certainly better than doing nothing. As noted earlier people have been talking about the sub-par lunches for a long time and nothing seems to come of it. Change often comes in steps. This is a positive one even if if not all-embracing at start-up. No one is ultimately saying good school nutrition is only for the less cost-sensitive forever. Maybe they can drive their costs down over time. Or others in the system will respond to what they are doing. Also for what it's worth and possibly most importantly their plan is energizing a dialog. Yes, the entire system currently in place needs an overhaul. However, sweeping change also often means red tape and discouragement. I like their "can do" approach as a small step.

Reply

Cliché

7:53 pm on Friday, April 2, 2010

I completely agree that it's starting a dialog, and I am sorry if I came off as hyper-sensitive :-(
At the end of the day, I truly hope this venture does cause the school board, or Chartwells to listen up and embrace the change we are calling for, or at the very least, mobilize even more people to get involved and act out for this cause.
As someone who sends her daughter to school with lunch, it would be easy for me, and I am sure most parents like me, to adopt a laissez-faire stance, and not really see the point in getting involved. Ultimately, I hope seeing the work that Peta has started ignites more Falcos and Buccis, because as you said, change comes in steps, and the more people who jump in to push for that change, the easier it may be to plow through the red tape and discouragement that an overhaul like this is absolutely going to present!
Have a wonderful weekend!!

Reply

Peta

12:12 pm on Saturday, April 3, 2010

Thanks Cliché, I couldn't have said it better! The most important thing here is that EatHoboken has started the conversation. I am advocating for better school nutrition and education. We have let one of our most primal needs fall by the wayside; Food! we are filling our children with toxins and its not acceptable. I appreciate all the support so far and hope that more parents will want to be involved on a school level. Honestly I think Time for Nutrition, LLC undermines the entire lunch program in our public schools and I would rather see that money going into the program so that ALL our kids can have access to nutritious meals! That said I don't blame them for seizing the opportunity. Im sure some parents will welcome the alternate to school lunches. Personally I am putting my efforts into something that benefits the majority and I invite all parents to join me. Together we can be heard, together we can create great things that will help transform our district. Its not just about food: its about educating that kids and creating healthy habits that will be with them for life! Its about starting school gardens and getting the kids involved in the farmers markets and getting them excited about eating, cooking and having a broader view on this world. Food doesn't grow in a box or in can or in a bag. They need to realize the impact these manufactures are having on our environment and ultimately the health of the human race.
Push for change! We CAN do it.

Reply
Comment_arrow

hullabaloo

8:37 pm on Saturday, April 3, 2010

As admirable as your intentions are (and I fully support your expose and push for healthy food in the schools) if you are interested in the majority; the majority of students in Hoboken public schools are on a free or reduced price lunch plan (about 68% district wide but as high as 98% in Connor's school). This majority will not be able to access your proposed lunch alternative unless your company can compete against Chartwells for the district contract. I would be surprised if any school board would support a two-tiered food service program.

Peta

10:10 pm on Saturday, April 3, 2010

@hullabaloo, you said "This majority will not be able to access your proposed lunch alternative unless your company can compete against Chartwells for the district contract." It is not my company and I am not in anyway involved in it.

My intention is to create a Wellness Committee which adopts wellness policies for the entire school district. This committee would work with whichever school lunch provider has been contracted and has the ability to raise funds which could contribute to specific projects or programs such as a school garden. The policies cover things such as nutrition, physical activity, nutrition education and what types of snacks and drinks are allowed to be sold at the schools. It's tailor-made to benefit our kids and in the end our town.
This is going to be a slow process but we have to start somewhere.
Thanks for the support and please keep up the conversation :)

Reply
Comment_arrow

hullabaloo

12:28 pm on Sunday, April 4, 2010

Thanks for the clarification.

pat

10:21 pm on Saturday, April 3, 2010

@Peta
Why are your fingers blue in that closeup of the chicken nugget?

Reply

Peta

12:02 am on Sunday, April 4, 2010

@pat, not sure where you see blue on my fingers in this close-up of the chicken nugget.

Reply

Cliché

10:47 am on Sunday, April 4, 2010

@Pat, I do not see any blue on Peta's fingers either.
@hullabaloo, unlike Time for Nutrition, Peta is NOT looking to provide an alternative to the school lunches that only a few people will be able to afford. What she is looking to do is set up a committee within the district that will work with the current lunch provider to ensure the food they make is up to certain health standards...for the entire district. This may mean fighting to find another lunch provider (as the more research I do, the less I believe Chartwells is ever going to change), but in no way will the students who receive a free or reduced lunch be left out due to financial constraints.

Reply

pat

12:36 pm on Sunday, April 4, 2010

@Peta & Cliche
It's the 7th photo, which is the same nugget as the 2nd photo

Reply

Leave a comment