patching...
Welcome back, Patch Blogger!

City Likely Unable to Pay Lawyers After Emergency Funds Aren't Passed

More than $600,000 in cost will have to paid at some point in the next weeks to pay lawyers and fire fighters.

 

In what seems to be a recurring discussion every meeting, the city council didn't approve more than $600,000 in emergency appropriations to pay for mostly salaries for firemen and legal costs. 

A super majority was needed on Wednesday night to pass the appropriations and the resolution failed in a 5-4 vote, with the council minority—made up of critics of the administration—voting no. 

In January, Finance Director Nick Trasente presented temporary appropriations—made up of a state mandated 26.5 percent of last year's roughly $100 million budget—to pay for the first few months of the year. 

Third Ward Councilman Michael Russo said he wouldn't approve any more appropriations. 

"I can’t go over 26.5 percent," Trasente told the councilman, "don’t sit there and tell me it’s a difference of opinion."

Tresante said that, by state law, he was not allowed to budget for more than 26.5 percent of last year's budget. Since then, he said, the fire unions have come to a collective bargaining agreement and salary costs in that department are about 15 percent higher than last year.

The extra cost were also supposed to pay for cost associated with the city's legal cost. A list of 27 law suits was presented to the city council, and there will likely not be enough money left in the line item to pay for the corporation counsel's services. 

"It's out of control!" Second Ward Councilwoman Beth Mason said. To which corporation counsel Mark Tabakin answered, "well, then stop getting sued."

Multiple legal services contracts that were supposed to be approved—for matters such as litigation involving the Monarch Project as well as rent control related law suits—on Wednesday night, but couldn't be after the appropriations failed. 

After the appropriations failed, Mayor Dawn Zimmer posted on Twitter: "I am surprised Councilwoman Mason voted not to fund litigation opposing Monarch project. I Hope she will change her mind."

There is currently $199,000 left for legal services in the city of Hoboken, and until March 31, approximately $328,000 will be needed to pay for all the work, Tabakin said. 

Trasente said that the fire department will be paid for another month. If the appropriations aren't passed by the March 21 meeting, the city won't be able to pay its employees, Trasente said. 

Related Topics: Leprecon

Eric sandler

11:48 pm on Wednesday, February 15, 2012

C'mon beth?? You told everyone you were against the monarch project...you even show up and speak at the Hudson county board meeting regarding the monarch project but now you vote against the legal fees to fight the project? Seriously? What gives?

Reply
Comment_arrow

hobokenhorse.com

12:46 am on Thursday, February 16, 2012

Finance Director Trasente was correct. MSV covers the irony of the latest actions putting the legal work opposing the Monarch and paying firefighters at risk.

Typical MORTe:

http://hobokenhorse.com

Mile Square View

Enough

12:12 am on Thursday, February 16, 2012

I oppose the Monarch too, but I am sick and tired of politicians playing with my money. I pay high taxes in this town. This mayor says she is not "corrupt" but she changed the calendar year to suit herself and her people, and they still can't deliver a budget on time. If they had done that, we wouldn't be having this discussion. The mayor and her cronies want over a half a million dollars up front and then you know what? You end up like Dave Roberts overspending the budget. Enough already.

Reply

Hobbs

12:32 am on Thursday, February 16, 2012

It has nothing to to with over spending the budget it is just sadly Mason, Russo & Co.'s standard obstructionism which will usually ends up costing Hoboken taxpayers more in the long run.

Remember their end game and number one goal is to cause as much chaos and disruption as possible and if it hurts people in Hoboken all the better.

Mike Russo who likes playing the loudest thug in the room and when everything is fully explained by rational experts like tonight he runs off on some inane tangent or flat out makes stuff up.

Reply

davidd

8:48 am on Thursday, February 16, 2012

I believe a large number of these lawsuits are nuisance lawsuits started at the instigation of the OG members of the council. It is in their political interests to have Hoboken be unable to defend against them. The OG are perfectly willing to funnel money to supporters and embarrass the administration at the taxpayer's expense.

Reply
Comment_arrow

Redrider765

8:56 am on Thursday, February 16, 2012

If that is the case, it is time to start counter suing for the city's legal expenses. Make them pay for trying to force the city to waste money if the suit has absolutely no merit what so ever.

Comment_arrow

Khoboken

1:02 pm on Thursday, February 16, 2012

Of course that was this is about. Who is suing th eCIty? Off fo the top of my head I can think of that idiot Campbbell that is in cohoots with Bet Mazin, and there are plenty of others. The practice has long been to have some insider sue the city and then the lawyers for the City slow stroke the case, milk it for lgeal fees and then set it up for a nice fat settlement payday and everyone gets their beak wet. That is how the game has been played for years and years. It no longer is being played as I understand that the CIty is now taking a hard line on settlement. WHy do you think Scarinici, who used to be the primary defense counsel for the CIty , turned traitor during the hospital sale? Peel back the layers of the onion, and follow the money. Why do you think that the coucnil memebrs form the Old Gaurd hate teh asst City counsel so much - she has become the new legal watchhdog and is not playing ball in accorandce with Old Guard rules.

Comment_arrow

Redrider765

1:05 pm on Thursday, February 16, 2012

I'd like the victories to start including some damages against the people who file these frivolous suits. Russo for example should be paying the BOE's legal fees for his attempted shakedown.

Comment_arrow

Khoboken

1:07 pm on Thursday, February 16, 2012

ANother exapmple was Pa Russo's bogus asbestos workers comp claim - but this time the City actaully fought hard and won. Most folks just recall that Pa Russo lost, not what the victory for the CIty actually meant.

Comment_arrow

CuriousGal

2:23 pm on Thursday, February 16, 2012

Courts are intended to work out disagreements in a civil and orderly manner. Before a claim is made, a judge rules on whether it is a valid claim (has some legal standing). Valid does not mean necessarily "right" or "wrong" but rather, there is a legitimate legal issue in dispute. If a claim is indeed "bogus" either a judge will not agree to entertain it or it is expected that the defendant's lawyer will present evidence that the plaintiff's case is without merit (= "bogus").

If in fact Mr. Russo's claims were "bogus" as Redrider insinuates (but does not substantiate) then it can be assumed there is reasonable expectation that the Board/City's attorney did not act in the best interest of their client by not requesting that the judge rule the suit essentially bogus. Of course, this would also mean less fees paid to the attorney since the attorney's are paid by the hour. A dismissal is much less expensive than a "decision" since a decision (legitimate claim) generally has discovery, depositions, testimonies, etc..

Perhaps Redrider should be venting at least some of his distain toward the defendants legal team.

Comment_arrow

demosthenes

3:10 pm on Thursday, February 16, 2012

Legal advice now from the same curioustwit who didn't know that we have an election every November. Now that's rich.

I'm curious - have you actually run your theory that "there's no such thing as a nuisance suit because judge's just throw them right out if asked" past anybody with a college education? You might want to consider doing so before posting again unless your goal is to simply enhance your growing reputation as this board's biggest imbecile.

Comment_arrow

Redrider765

3:16 pm on Thursday, February 16, 2012

Yeah, legal advice from someone so clueless is rather humorous to read. She is a little too obtuse to have any clue what the hell she is talking about.

Comment_arrow

Khoboken

3:25 pm on Thursday, February 16, 2012

Idiot gal wrote

"Courts are intended to work out disagreements in a civil and orderly manner. Before a claim is made, a judge rules on whether it is a valid claim (has some legal standing)."

She has just confioremd that she trily is, hands down, the offical MORON OF THE INTERNET!!!!! She has landed atop the likes of whiskeytango a gogo and others. But undeniably, by far, the biddest idiot. Please, dont edumacate her about why she is so dumb, just leave her in her thoughtless state of blissful imbecility.

Hobbs

3:27 pm on Thursday, February 16, 2012

Should the City of Hoboken take Ma and Pa Russo to court to try to get repaid for all the years of medical benefits they took fand were not entitled to ?

I hear Ma now has what many people have called a political patronage job in the Union City BOE so she has income that ourt can attach.

Reply

ReconNJ201

3:35 pm on Thursday, February 16, 2012

This council along with its supporting cast should be ashamed of themselves. The major has to be removed immediately she continues to play devils advocate and at the end of the day should always think about the tax paying resident then there own pockets. It's a shame that this city has to pay for there mistakes and propaganda. We need to get rid of them all place a new work force. In other words out with old and in with new.

Reply
Comment_arrow

Redrider765

3:36 pm on Thursday, February 16, 2012

Uh, you drunk or something? Major? There? All place?

Comment_arrow

demosthenes

3:44 pm on Thursday, February 16, 2012

Who is the major? I agree that we are entiltled to be governed by at least a colonel now that our population has exceeded 50,000. We should either promote her or get rid of her. Maybe we should add that as non binding ballot question to the November ballot if this is one of those unusual years in which we have a November election. Maybe Curioustwit can look it up for us.

Comment_arrow

FAP

3:49 pm on Thursday, February 16, 2012

I refused to be governed by anything less than an O6.

Comment_arrow

Redrider765

4:06 pm on Thursday, February 16, 2012

Divisions usually are run by generals and Hoboken is bigger than 2 divisions combined. Technically, we might qualify as a Corps. I think we merit at least a 2 star general, maybe a 3 star if we are lucky. But no way in hell a major would run a town w/ 50K residents.

ReconNJ201

4:35 pm on Thursday, February 16, 2012

LOL I enjoy people that take a grammatical error to heart and correct someone but can't really undertstand the point at hand and your probably saying to your if the words were spelled right the message can better understood. Not a problem no one is perfect. The point in hand is my city needs to understand who they elected and next election take the stand to replace her and the council. Enough said.

Reply
Comment_arrow

Mad Mike

9:08 pm on Thursday, February 16, 2012

Are you for real? The best thing that ever happened to this city was Zimmer's election and the mold guard's loss of the Council major-ity. If was up to the complete and utter crooks that you support, our taxes would have tripled by now, not been reduced.

Comment_arrow

Hoboken Answer

9:27 pm on Thursday, February 16, 2012

Yeah because moochers have been lined up and waiting for their just due of taxpayer monies in envelopes given out to you and your pals.

Don't count on it.

John Keim

12:39 am on Friday, February 17, 2012

The city has been sued by so many people due to EXECUTIVE incompetence that our legal bills are through the roof. Don't blame the council minority or majority. This is the executive branch's fault. It falls squarely on the mayor.

Reply
Comment_arrow

Grafix Avenger

8:00 am on Friday, February 17, 2012

Which is why the Old Guard morons are lining up "Bush's Florida attorney" for another frivolous law suit on 'Letting the People Decide' so their CC counterparts and operatives like yourself can wail about exorbitant legal fees. Pitchers and hitters.

And of course there's the ginned up Cammarano lawsuit and the ginned up Campbell lawsuit... and all the extra attorney fees ($500K or thereabouts) because your gal MASON fought like hell against the HUMC sale and dragged that out to the City's expense.

You-all should shut your yaps. You force the City;s professionals to work, so they have to get paid.

How about asking Flo Amato why she's suing HOBOKEN for the unpaid balance on an ILLEGAL campaign loan she made to Cammarano's campaign? You shill for the CROOKS.

http://grafixavenger.blogspot.com/2011/12/more-cammy-complaint-funny-business.html

Comment_arrow

Redrider765

8:12 am on Friday, February 17, 2012

Eh, hard to take a guy seriously who shills for a vote buyer especially when his wife helped work on a campaign that passed out so many checks and incompetently filled out those campaign filings she was responsible for submitting.

Comment_arrow

Deborah Hulbert

9:38 am on Friday, February 17, 2012

Yes, John Keim, I agree...MAYOR DAVE ROBERTS, that is!

Comment_arrow

FAP

9:46 am on Friday, February 17, 2012

John Keim please name me 2 suits that have been brought on by the executive office and explain how the executive brought on the suit. The class will wait why you gather yourself.

Comment_arrow

Bob R

9:51 am on Friday, February 17, 2012

Well lookee here, John Krime is back! How's the syndicate treating you, Mr. Krime?

John Krime yearns longingly for the good old days when the city didn't have any disgruntled ex-employees because the gravy train fleecers made sure there was enough graft to go around. A few payoffs here and there make everyone happy and keep the peace, ain't that right, Mr. Krime? Ah, the good old days!

Too bad Dawn Zimmer has not been arrested or incarcerated yet. That is the #1 criterion for earning Mr. Krime's support. Nothing like a little jail time to prove your muster to run Hoboken properly. Thanks, as always, for your unique perspective, Mr. Krime.

Comment_arrow

Khoboken

3:15 pm on Saturday, February 18, 2012

The sad part is that you actually believe the crap that you post. See GA today and she has the real deal on how all this has gone down.

Bet Mazin

1:51 am on Friday, February 17, 2012

If the mayor would cooperate and stop pushing for people to put in a full work day with real effort, there would be no need for people to turn on their former employer and sue the city.

I'm very concerned about jobs which is why I'm providing legal representation for people to sue the city of Hoboken. We must sue the city until proper payouts are maintained to all our friends.

Thank you and vote for me if you want to bring back the good times in city government.

Reply
Comment_arrow

prosbus

2:49 am on Friday, February 17, 2012

Maybe Dawn should make a statement that she will personally pay for any lawsuits which result from EXECUTIVE incompetence, intimidation, or deliberate harassment (including settlements) by she or her staff.

Comment_arrow

Grafix Avenger

8:02 am on Friday, February 17, 2012

prosbus the RAT, it's amazing you still creep out of your rathole after what you did to Perry Belfiore.

The Feds are getting CLOSER....

http://grafixavenger.blogspot.com/2012/02/tapping-hornets-nest.html

Comment_arrow

Redrider765

8:10 am on Friday, February 17, 2012

Will Mason & Russo pay the city's expenses related to any criminal wrongdoing? Yeah, didn't think so considering the Russo family owes the city a few hundred grand already related to that & it is suspected that multiple criminal investigations are ongoing that may involved either those 2 or their lackeys.

John Keim

12:23 pm on Friday, February 17, 2012

FAP, the suits are being brought over personel issues, strictly the purview of the executive branch at city hall and there are a lot more than two (Campbell, Arrezzo, Andrianni come to mind immediately, all about civil service rules being broken by the administration). Not the legislative branch, not the judicial. Government 101 (oh yeah, you hate governing but you love to do negative campaign - anyone not supporting the administration is "old guard", criminal, corrupt, stupid or all of the above).

Reply
Comment_arrow

HobokenOwl

12:33 pm on Friday, February 17, 2012

Oh, I think I can speak for almost everyone on here when I say we think you're stupid and possibly corrupt. Your love of Beth Mason has your head so far up her bum you can smell her farts but can't see the light. It's pathetic.

Arezzo should have been fired a decade or more ago. The man was as corrupt as they come according to countless victims of his "pay me now" tactics. Andrianni was on the SWAT debacle under Roberts. Campbell? I don't know who that is. But if you're defending either of the first two, or suggesting they have a case, you're a bigger ass than I thought.

Comment_arrow

RedHaven

12:42 pm on Friday, February 17, 2012

You tell em John!!!!! My other screen name CG has already explained to these idiots that the fact that the Judge didn't throw out these lawsuits on day 1 proves that they all have "merit" and are caused by Zimmer's incompetence. Everyone knows that you can't say things in a lawsuit if its not true - that could get the lawyer in trouble which is why lawyers always tell the truth like when Donald Scarincci made all those charges that the stupid judge threw out when he let that shrew save the hospital we were trying to destroy. .

Everyone who sues the City is a heroic truthteller - that's why Beth offers to pay their legal fees and help in anyway she can. It's a shame that her support for all these noble lawsuits can't be discussed publicly due to all those unfair conflict rules she's violating but someday the story will be told and everyone will know of her power.

We love you Beth!!

Comment_arrow

FAP

12:44 pm on Friday, February 17, 2012

The Old Guard knows the history of Hoboken is that if you sue you get paid off. Mayor Zimmer ended this horrendous practice.

.
I noticed you didn't include Riccardi or Aliccea and their purported suits. Is it because they were frivolous on their face? These jokers claim rules were broken but that's just their claim. In fact some of the legal bills are because the city is now fighting frivolous lawsuits so that in the future they won't occur.

.
John I hope one day you put your bitterness behind you. Ines' freeholder loss was no one's fault, perhaps her own but it's debatable if she ever had a path to victory.

.
John there are people are around you who happily use you, your wife, and your savings as cannon fodder. Ines came in a distant third and there were people telling you to hire a lawyer and fight for a recount for God's sake. Maybe it's time to look at who these people really are.

.
John, I wish you and Ines the best of luck with coming to grips with what they did to you. It won't be easy but it's the path to a healthy life.

Comment_arrow

Napoleon Complex

12:49 pm on Friday, February 17, 2012

RedHaven, Never admit your curiousgal alias!!!! C'mon honey.

Now let's hit Macy's later. Boy's suits are on sale

Comment_arrow

Bob R

1:03 pm on Friday, February 17, 2012

Mr. Krime, do you mean "personnel issues"? These are the matters of administration employees to which you refer. As opposed to "personal issues," like the ones that can lead to irrational and erratic behavior and mouth-foaming dementia.

As to the examples you cited, yes, you are correct, this administration is likely not the most comfortable haven for "workers" of this caliber.
Campbell: Do-nothing schlub who even Roberts had the good sense to supplement with another employee who didn't think he desk was on the front steps of City Hall by the ashtray. Poster child for Old Guard indifference to productivity so long as you're a "friend."
Andriani: Poster child for police misconduct/impropriety. Guns-to-bimbos scandal, Tampa airport scandal, unadulturated scumbag, face of disgrace.
Arezzo: Really, John? Really??? One of the most notoriously, shamelessly corrupt city officials in Hoboken history, the focal point through which many of the city's worst practices used to run?

This is what it's come to, John? Seriously? And what, because Zimmer doesn't call you and your wife and stroke your deluded, overblown egos? "Personal issues," indeed. Get help.

Eric Kurta

12:31 pm on Friday, February 17, 2012

GA is correct. It is no coincidence that lawsuits against the BOE and city are springing up right and left while miNOrity council members and BOE members focus on legal costs. This is a coordinated effort straight out of the Russo Criminal Association playbook.

Reply
Comment_arrow

Redrider765

1:23 pm on Friday, February 17, 2012

The coordinated response should be to countersue for legal expenses every time.

Comment_arrow

prosbus

2:01 pm on Friday, February 17, 2012

easier said than done--- let them try. Again, if a suit is valid, neither party is going to recoup legal costs.

Comment_arrow

demosthenes

2:18 pm on Friday, February 17, 2012

But I thought all suits were valid since all not valid suits were thrown out instantly by the judge if only the city's lawyers were smart enough to ask. That's what Curioustwit said anyway and except for not knowing that we have elections every November she knows pretty much everything just like you.

Its time to switch to new screennames - prosbus and curioustwit are too firmly established as imbeciles to be taken seriously by anybody.

John Keim

9:42 pm on Friday, February 17, 2012

You all misinterpret me - i am not defending the "merits" of any of them or the characters of the people involved - I am only commenting on the fact that there are a ton of suits out there having to do with the improper hiring/firing procedures of the EXECUTIVE branch - many of these 27 suits as mentioned in the other article have dragged on. Bob R et al, I am not bitter - in fact I can comfortably socialize with our current freeholder and by the way I do not necessarily speak for anyone but myself. Addtionally I resent your calling me a criminal merely because I disagree with the current administration.

Reply
Comment_arrow

hobokenhorse.com

10:03 pm on Friday, February 17, 2012

Sorry John, read you own comment again. If you are not defending the merits of the people suing the City, then you can NOT conclude anything.

The cases involving personnel are not a ton, not even the majority of the cases before the City Council in a special meeting next Wednesday.

Here's where you have the option to read the list of cases on tap and educate yourself on reality:

http://hobokenhorse.com

Mile Square View

Comment_arrow

Redrider765

11:19 pm on Friday, February 17, 2012

Nobody in Masonland cares about reality or the truth.

Comment_arrow

puzzledone

8:54 am on Saturday, February 18, 2012

I am only commenting on the fact that there are a ton of suits out there having to do with the improper hiring/firing procedures of the EXECUTIVE branch

Agree completely. Russo and Roberts and those before them should not have hired such awful corrupt people as Arezzo, Campbell, and Correa, as their records of ineffectiveness of fraud shows. Of course, Zimmer has to do what she can to get rid of these guys, otherwise the city will never get clear of the path that the convicted felons who used to run this town left us in.

As for the dragging on, GA has a nice post about that, the fact that lawyers, who may also have been corrupt (I know, who could have possibly thought) would extend the cases to get more money out of the city.

John Keim

11:49 pm on Friday, February 17, 2012

Roman I am saying that the executive branch's handling of these issues opened us up to more lawsuits than Capiello, Vezzetti, Pasculli, Russo or Roberts dealt with just as we thought we could pay lawyers on an hourly basis instead of having them on staff - that decision is also costing us. As one of your online bully buddies mentioned a while back, I could state the sky is blue and you all would pile on just for the sake of piling on.

Reply
Comment_arrow

Hobbs

12:05 am on Saturday, February 18, 2012

Having lawyers "on staff" in all the specialties needed by Hoboken has been addressed and found be totally impractical and would be vastly more expensive.

The City Council minority is again playing Russian Roulette with the gun pointed at the head of Hoboken's taxpayers.

Comment_arrow

Redrider765

9:06 am on Saturday, February 18, 2012

Hobbs, the minority would not only love it if the city wasted a fortune on an internal staff off attorneys, they'd love it if we hired a completely incompetent staff of lawyers so we'd have to spend a fortune on both the internal staff and on external law firms who would be doing all the work. For them, all they care about is screwing things up, driving up the costs and increasing taxes so they can blame the mayor. Bunch of scum, the whole lot of them. And shocked that anyone would believe that pack of liars and cheaters even though they have seen how often they have been exposed as liars & cheats.

Comment_arrow

hobokenhorse.com

10:42 am on Saturday, February 18, 2012

Sorry John, you are making conclusions based on no evidence. We've all seen the talking points springing up on legal costs and how Hoboken is overwhelmed with lawsuits as former Corporation Counsel Michael Kates lamented in a meeting.

Take up any issue where you feel bullied with that person who is making you feel bad, not me.

No one is piling on, except for we hope the FBI, which should make a lot of people feel a whole lot worse.

Comment_arrow

CuriousGal

5:50 am on Monday, February 20, 2012

legal fees at city hall and the board of ed are literally out of control--- it's the New Guard's way of distributing graft around the state to their backers. Just follow the money. Thank goodness a super majority is needed to pay these fees else this administration's legal fees would be 3x higher.

I STILL can't get over this summer when the hospital attorney went $600,000 OVER "do not exceed" limits and the zimmer zombies on this site supported and justified the action. It's just a laugh....

Leave a comment