Emotional Turnout Backs Two Popular Teachers Fighting to Keep Their Jobs
BOE hears support for theater director Ohaus and Johns Hopkins program director Hillenbrand.
A packed crowd showed its support Tuesday for two popular teachers fighting to keep their jobs, but the Board of Education approved a measure anyway that could cost theater director Paula Ohaus and Johns Hopkins Program head Cheng Yen Hillenbrand their positions.
Technically, the board extended the deadline for School Superintendent Mark Toback to notify non-tenured teachers that their contracts will not be renewed, from April 30 to May 15. Otherwise, it would be too late legally for him to give the required notice to Ohaus, Hillenbrand and four other unidentified teachers who may also lose their jobs.
The Board voted 5-4 to change the notification date, during a heated and emotional School Board meeting.
Hillenbrand, Ohaus and the four other teachers have already received non-renewal notices.
The decision whether or not to renew a teacher's contract lies in the hands of the superintendent and has to be approved by the School Board. The names of the four other teachers who were to lose their jobs were not on the agenda, but Ohaus and Hillenbrand have chosen to take their case public instead of conducting it privately with the Board of Education.
Parents, teachers and students packed the room on Tuesday night, causing the meeting to go well after midnight. The members of the public were there to speak up against the change of the notification date and to urge the superintendent to renew the contracts of Hillenbrand and Ohaus.
Superintendent Toback addressed some of the concerns of the personnel matters during his opening statement.
The potential dismissal of Ohaus and Hillenbrand has placed Toback in the hot seat with district parents only a few weeks into his job. As he staunchly defended his decisions on the personnel matters, many of those in the audience would not accept his explanations and strongly urged him to know the history of the two educators before making a decision.
"I just feel the superintendent needs to take his time before making these important decisions involving the students in our district," Ohaus said. Ohaus briefly resigned from her position last month, because she said she felt harassed in her job.
“I had excellent support [from the community],” Hillenbrand said. “They were very generous in their compliments and I really appreciate their understanding in what I wanted to do for the kids.”
Toback said that the nonrenewal determinations—which he said he has not officially recommended to the board yet—were based on performance issues and concerns over accusations made about these teachers. During the public portion of the meeting, it was insinuated that many of these accusations and evaluations were initiated by prior Acting Superintendent Dr. Peter Carter. Neither Ohaus nor Hillenbrand have ever had poor performance reviews within their years of service respectively until of late. Ohaus has been criticized in the past for hosting sleepovers at her house for the students in the theater program.
As a compromise, Toback offered Ohaus to continue as the director of the theater arts program and end her job as teacher at the high school. Toback said he did not want to offer Ohaus her teaching position, where she could gain tenure, based on his concerns about her performance and conduct with students.
Ohaus did not accept the compromise.
A heated exchange flew back and forth between Toback and members of the audience. Some board members also expressed their concerns, and Ohaus chimed in on her own defense.
The stated concerns of conduct included Ohaus having students in her house and taking students to places without parental permission. Ohaus, on the other hand, did show slips of paper, which she said she has parents sign giving their consent for any activity outside of school including taking students to visit and interview at colleges for potential admission.
The back-and-forth discussion stalled the regular proceedings of the meeting, which were returned to momentarily at 9:10 p.m. in order to complete board president reports and committee reports. Once those were concluded, the public portion began. The floor was opened to several upset speakers, who were allowed to say their piece to the board and Toback.
The community uproared in standing applause when Ohaus and Hillenbrand were up to address the Board of Education, and in one instance a student cried out, “We love you Ms. Ohaus!”
"And I love you guys too," she answered. But, she added, "it seems to get me in a lot of trouble."
Ohaus proceeded to give her side of the story about the events leading up to her non-renewal, saying that Toback has not been in his job long enough to make a determination like this.
"For 14 years I have dedicated myself to the kids here in Hoboken," Ohaus said. "My position is to help these kids get to where they need to go and I have done that. I have never been involved in anything like this in my whole life."
In much the same way Hillenbrand defended herself and her contributions to the district. A certified kindergarten through 5th grade teacher and mother of a gifted child, Hillenbrand came to the Connors School in 2006, and soon after brought the John Hopkins University Gifted and Talented Program to the school district. The program is meant to deliver challenging educational opportunities that develop the intellect, encourage achievement, and nurture social development of advanced students.
Hillenbrand serves as coordinator and runs the program with a handful of teachers, which look to excel and nurture gifted and talented students to reach their full potentials.
“When I came to Hoboken I found enough to start a program for a segment of kids who are under represented,” said Hillenbrand.
With Hillenbrand’s possible non-renewal, the future of the program has been called into question by parents and some board members. Toback has assured them that the program will continue.
Assistant Superintendent Walter Rusak and Toback said Hillenbrand's contract will not be renewed, because she doesn't have the proper certification to conduct the program with students beyond the 5th grade.
Hillenbrand rebutted that her role in the program is not as a teacher, but as a support and aide for students to encourage their advancement.
If certification is required for her to oversee the program, Hillenbrand said she would be happy to obtain it, and just requested that the board be fair and give her time to do so. However, Dr. Toback and Rusak claim that she had been informed of this requirement in 2008 through a written letter, which Hillenbrand claimed she never saw nor signed.
Hillenbrand also said that she did not feel she had been given ample time and opportunity to make her case at the meeting.
franksinatra
3:46 pm on Wednesday, May 11, 2011
A sad night for Hoboken. The story needed to make clear that it was the Kids First majority that voted to, in effect, fire Ohaus and Hillenbrand. The five culprits that people need to remember are Markle, Minutillo, Sobolov, McAllister and Gold. To answer the question that everyone is asking--Minutillo and McAllister are up for reelection next year. Only 11 months to go before the voters can win some justice for Ohaus and Hillenbrand. These two will get much more justice when they win the lawsuits against the district that are surely coming. The big mystery is Sobolov. Paula says she's been to the parties at her house that have suddenly become so controversial under Toback. Her kids are in Hillenbrand's math program and Cheng-Yen said they have done very well. Paula even called out Sobolov last night, all but imploring her to do the right thing and save the theater program. Sobolov used to be St. Irene in this town. Now she's in the darkest corner of the dark side, killing excellent schools programs that her own kids are in, and all for no reason. Just another sad part of a sad night.
Deborah Hulbert
4:13 pm on Wednesday, May 11, 2011
Oh, get over yourself! Ohaus has displayed such a poor lack of judgement in driving HHS kids around in her car and hosting sleep-overs in her home. Don't you get it??? The kids eat this stuff up ("Wow, she's on our side. She's really cool, not like my parents!") Ohaus is a litigation trainwreck about to leave the station...I honestly don't understand how any responsible parent would be in favor of keeping her. She has a very strong psychological need to be idolized by her students which completely impairs any judgment she otherwise may have had. Do not be fooled by this needy woman.
Khoboken
11:39 pm on Wednesday, June 15, 2011
DH
Agreed 100%. Too much time has been wasted on this already.
cschott
5:08 pm on Wednesday, May 11, 2011
Deborah, you need to get over yourself. The parents (who appeared to be pretty cool and smart when they spoke out last night), as well as the kids, as well as alumni, as well as the Nederlander Organization, Paper Mill, Montclair, as well as the previous school administration, etc. etc. all support her.
pat
5:24 pm on Wednesday, May 11, 2011
You can be high on cool and short on brains. None of the supporters you mentioned hold any liability for her antics.
pied piper
6:05 pm on Wednesday, May 11, 2011
Parents appeared cool and smart?I hear they want the superintendent to break laws and yelled all kind of insults from the audience because he said he couldn't grant lifetime tenure to a teacher who engaged in illegal acts and to make matters worse, The same teacher went on to say not only had she broken policy, she would continue to do so. The parents and others in support of Ohaus applauded wildly in support of this.
Great way to educate the youth: Superiors, taking direction and following laws are for idiots! Insubordination and breaking laws RULES!
How many insubordinate people are successful?
seezall
6:18 pm on Wednesday, May 11, 2011
everyone take a drink every time pied/jane/nicetry lies on behalf of the kids first losers.
when did paula say she broke policy and she's going to do it again? liar liar liar liar liar liar liar
let's hear you defend the gruesome twosome - minitillo and markel who can't be bothered even listening to the public cause they are too busy doodling.
pied piper
6:50 pm on Wednesday, May 11, 2011
She is planning another soirre at her digs and told Toback he should come...
gruesome twosome-How old are you? Sounds like you have a personal/obsession problem.
seezall
5:20 pm on Wednesday, May 11, 2011
What up, Deb? Googled you and it says you are a partner at Pitta & Giblin LLP. Ms. Hulbert has practiced as an attorney in the areas of employee benefits, employment and labor law for more than 20 years.
As an employment lawyer you don't see a problem with changing their contract after the April 30 deadline for non-renewing them had already passed?
Deborah Hulbert
10:05 am on Thursday, May 12, 2011
seezall
I'm less worried about that than the potential liability to the City posed by Ohaus' deliberate violations of School Policy. Accomplished lawyers know enough to take into account multiple factors and balance the relative benefits and risks.
khoboken
5:42 pm on Wednesday, May 11, 2011
I am disgusted, at this point, that any of my tax money goes to pay Outhouse's salary. Her sense of entitlement is beyond belief. If she wants to be a teacher in a public school systmen, then teach. If she wants to run a private theatre comapny, then leave. I am not paying for a private theater company operating in the school system when the acadmics are so miserable and the enrollment is declining. And please don't threaten about removing your kids from the school if she leaves. Go ahead and just do it already. I am sick of the elelction cycle crap that this asshat of a non tenured teacher pulls.
seezall
6:19 pm on Wednesday, May 11, 2011
She's non-tenured, k? OMG! That's like the worst thing in the entire world, right? kids first phony irene used to lurve "outhouse".used to party with her kids at the "outhouse". now she jsut sits there and looks sick from stabbing paula in the back or maybe she is just craving some nicotine. phony irene used to give tours of the high school and praise paula up this side and down. my best guess is that ro markle sat on her and destroyed phony irene's backbone. if she ever had one.
pat
6:29 pm on Wednesday, May 11, 2011
A little bitter, are we? Irene is following her conscience. She has the backbone to stand up to Paula's emotional, dramatic nonsense and I admire her for it. If Paula was a consummate professional, she would have been creative enough to work within the rules.
pied piper
6:54 pm on Wednesday, May 11, 2011
Seesall -angry much? When you are old enough to get your drivers licence come back and post with the adults.
seezall
8:18 pm on Wednesday, May 11, 2011
pied i bet you laughed so hard at your own joke that you peed in your Depends.
franksinatra
6:23 pm on Wednesday, May 11, 2011
A footnote to this fiasco--Toback did nothing last night to dispel the very strong suspicion among parents that the letters posted on Patch on Monday between Markle, Toback and union boss Enrico were backdated to April 19 and 20. That made it seem as though their agreement to push back the firing deadline to May 15 was done before the contractual deadline of April 30. Under questioning from board member Sullivan, Enrico said the discussions about switching the date began April 18 and Toback said the firing letters were all written and ready to go then. So why weren't they sent out then and (as is required) the board notified? There were still two weeks to the April 30 deadline. Why go to all the trouble of secret deals with the union and the dubious legality of changing a hard and fast deadline retroactively? When Sullivan brought this up, Toback looked so obviously busted it was embarrassing. He stammered something about the school break beginning April 22, but that still left four days (incl. the half day on the 21st). And of course he could've worked a day or two during the break, like many of us not on government schedules have to do. He also mumbled something wanting to wait for the outcome of the board elections on the 27th in case the budget got voted down. But he looked silly saying that. Budgets never go down here and by law the budget couldn't be cut anyway, and if you had to cut, you'd cut more people not fewer, so how would the budget affect this?
pied piper
6:57 pm on Wednesday, May 11, 2011
Is it true that Sullivan voted for CarmeloGarica as Board President?
State regulations say May 15th or 60 days notice. Apparently either form of notification is acceptable.
AllenB
11:43 pm on Wednesday, May 11, 2011
Even if they hadn't extended the deadline, there was little the teachers could have done had they been nonrenewed after the contract date. They won't get tenure automatically if they get renewed. They have to work the time. The April 30th issue is being overblown for political reasons. People want to attack Kids First and the union and this gives them a chance to do both. The hearing they will have next month is where the Board can really act. This looks like it was just political theater.
franksinatra
6:23 pm on Wednesday, May 11, 2011
Toback also said something about being humane to the people being fired by not rushing this through (as through trumping up fake charges, maligning their reputations with bogus, made-to-order performance reviews, and ruining the programs they built is humane in Toback’s book). But Sullivan called him out on that, asking whether it’s humane to allow the April 30 deadline to come and go, giving them the impression that they had gotten tenure (under state law you automatically are renewed if you get no notice by the deadline), and then yank that renewal away on May 4. Toback, of course, had no answer. What probably happened is that Toback got back from vacation Monday, May 2, suddenly realized the Hoboken deadline was April 30 (in most districts it’s May 15), made a quick deal with Enrico and Markle, sent out the firing letters (Hillenbrand said she got hers May 4), notified the board (members said meetings were held May 3 & 4), backdated the letters to not look like a total idiot, and got the whole thing done in four days—the exact same number of days he had if he really had started dealing with this April 18, as he claims. Sobolov said she never heard about this switch in the dates until last week and there’s no way Kids First would’ve done something so big without clueing in their members. For all this we’re paying Toback $155,000 a year--and he had us sue to get $20,000 more just for the privilege of coming here and destroying our district.
pied piper
7:01 pm on Wednesday, May 11, 2011
You sure do know a-lot about what Sullivan said and seem to have some type of esp ability enabling you to know what others are thinking. Great trait to have!
Do you support granting lifetime tenure to teachers who have a record of insubordination, violating policies and not follwing directions from superiors?
seezall
8:14 pm on Wednesday, May 11, 2011
pied, hmmmm, smells like you are a tenured teacher who isn't very popular. you're probably a total hack that gets off on waving your tenure under the noses of the people who make you look bad. i bet you think that fellow union hack enrico did a terrific job last night. he was practically spitting on the people sitting around him.
if you're so thrilled with the kids first losers, why didn't you stand up and defend them? why didn't you have the guts to stand up at the microphone and trash Paula? looked like Phony Irene was going to projectile vomit during the whole meeting. you probably are jsut like her and have your kids in Ohaus's and Hillenbrand's classes but you trash them behind their back.
i was at that meeting and Maureen Sullivan was brilliant! the way she told off that eyerolling jerk of a board president was amazing. ro markle was totally unprofessional and rude and sullivan and ms. candelaria were right to call her and the minutillo out. they are the ones who need to grow up. if the meeting was out of control it was their fault. and what's the deal with the orange guy on the far right hand side? he's jsut a mean old dude. where did kids first find these people?
but i don't want to get off track. KIDS FIRST FIRED PAULA OHAUS!!!!! KIDS FIRST FIRED CHENYEN HILLENBRAND!!!!!
jim ohaus
7:01 pm on Wednesday, May 11, 2011
pp
franksinatra
8:19 pm on Wednesday, May 11, 2011
Thanks, pp. It's great to have esp, but I'm just repeating what she said at the meeting. No special knowledge.
On tenure, no I don't. But Paula doesn't have any of those issues. Read Toback's letter from last month. He raised a bunch of issues but all of them were refuted, easily explained or just plain wrong. There are no proven charges of her violating policies and not following directions. You're just smearing her by continuing to say that when you know all the charges have been debunked--not one charge stood up. Toback knows none of his original charges held up in the end so that's why he had to accuse her of calling DYFS on the hip hop mom. But that didn't hold up either (and even if she did call DYFS, so what? shouldn't she be commended for that if it were necessary?). So Toback has nothing. He just doesn't like her and that's a good enough reason to fire her and ruin the theater program?
pied piper
9:16 pm on Wednesday, May 11, 2011
Actually the tape on channel 77 clearly shows that all of these issues were not refuted. Anyone with cable TV can watch it for themselves.
Fire her? First she quit, then she rescinded her notice to quit, then asked for a public discussion where she admitted to multiple violation of policies and from what I hear at last night's meeting she said she would continue with those she felt were appropriate, regardless of superintendent direction.
As a role model and as a person who cares about the well being of her students, maybe Ms Ohaus should have discussed her issues in private, as was recommended. She broke multiple policies multiple times-she did this- not carter-not toback-not kids first. Blaming others for short falls and calling it harassment is ridiculous. Other teachers, somehow, get through an entire career without violating policy. Why can't she?
On to the educational issue- this district spent countless hours of precious time discussing an afterschool theater department issue (7 hours at the last board meeting, alone). This is a Public educational facility. We need to have a strong focus on academic classroom objectives. While I understand and appreciate the work Ms. Ohaus and the students in this district have accomplished, I am also mindful of the core curriculum content standards and raising the bar for academic excellence. Thic cannot and should not continue in the manner nor the time it has taken away from the other 1800 or so students.
MadisonMonroe
10:59 pm on Wednesday, May 11, 2011
Pied Piper, you are quite right, the focus should be on academic classroom objectives. Then please explain why why why Kids First fired the head of the Johns Hopkins U program. It is solely about academics for the kids who are top performers. I doubt that it's any fun at all, which should make you happy.
I get that they don't like Paula Ohaus, but what have they and Dr. Toback got against Ms. Hillenbrand, who from all accounts is a serious academic who has created a magnificent math program out of nothing. I haven't heard anything about sleepovers or charter school ruffians sneaking into the math lab.
But Ms. Hillenbrand had to go too? You do seem hepped up on policy. So what policy did the lady violate?
If you dare to complain about the management of the meeting, I suggest you take it up with Kids First. They knew exactly what they were getting by placing Ms. Markle at the helm for the third year running: Yelling, fighting, gavel banging, off putting body language, snottiness, aggressiveness, and a total lack of knowledge of meeting procedure.
If Dr. Toback was prepared to release these employees on April 19/20 why didn't he do it then. Why would he put the district in serious legal jeopardy by waiting to inform them until after April 30 when they thought they were already rehired for the following year? It was clear from the April 12 meeting that she humiliated him and she had to go. I would think he was preparing her exit papers first thing on April 13.
Redrider765
11:33 pm on Wednesday, May 11, 2011
I suggest you read the article since your question was answered already.
khoboken
2:14 pm on Thursday, May 12, 2011
Please - stop withthe whining and the utter disutign dipslkay of immtyrity by adults. Peolpe have been lsoign their jobs reoutinely for the aspt three years. I am sure that polenty of peopel woudl have liked more advance ntoice. But that nicety hasnot been extended to the vast majority of people who have been "downsized". They have just sucked it up and dealt with thte situaiton. I can not think of any earthly reason why Outhouse would be kept as a teacher int eh school system after her latest "performance".
Redrider765
2:38 pm on Thursday, May 12, 2011
Politics would be the only reason and it is a horrible reason.
franksinatra
4:17 pm on Thursday, May 12, 2011
Hoboken in the news:
http://www.my9tv.com/dpp/my9_news/nj_videos/beloved-hoboken-teacher-on-the-chopping-block
seezall
4:19 pm on Thursday, May 12, 2011
k, please stop with the fat thumbs. we get it. you're an angry stay at home mom who doesn't get the respect she thinks she deserves even with a business degree from somewhere like penn state or udelaware. you've got a crackberry and a lot of time on your hands. like pp, the angry tenured teacher who thinks pledging allegiance to those kf phonies is more important than educating children, you resent that women like hillenbrand and ohaus have real jobs and are successful.
talk about whining. how about that kf idiot ruth mcallister? we are still mocking her stupid comparison last month of her father the physics teacher and her mother the rocket scientist and her sister the teacher and her other sister the teacher and her other sister the teacher and her other sister the teacher and her other sister the teacher who would never have a sleepover (you have to do the imitation with a really nasally whiney voice.) as if someone would want to have a sleepover with them!
she's another phony and so are those other board people markel and sobolov and minutillo who hang around the high school all the time spying on paula. you can't walk in the front door without tripping over one of them in their sad mom jeans. they don't have jobs so they rag on successful women who do it all, work and children. markel's son graduated 2 years ago but she won't leave. get a life lady. you suck up all the air.
leafy
4:52 pm on Thursday, May 12, 2011
Markel still hanging with Judy Burrell?
franksinatra
6:06 pm on Thursday, May 12, 2011
Yep. It was Judy who started this whole thing. She's always been jealous of Paula because Paula won lots of awards, was great at her job and the kids loved her. Judy's track teams go nowhere. So she put the bug in Markle's ear and Markle and her flunky Minutillo put the bug in Carter's and Rusak's ear and it was a done deal by the time Toback got here. For a football player Toback is proving quite a wimp. Rusak is your classic bully. He made sure Carter always got in line and Toback is utterly intimidated. If Toback were a man he would've bid Rusak farewell the day he started. What good manager keeps his interim predecessor around for more than a day, looking over his shoulder, second-guessing everything? Doesn't Toback know anything about running an organization??? So we have two bullies calling all the shots for the schools--Markle, who makes sure the Kids First "reformers" never reform anything, and Ruzak, who may be even a bigger hack. He couldn't even remember to tell Toback the right date for firing people. He thinks you can put unsigned, unseen evaluations into a personnel file, and pretend that the teacher knew all about them. He claims a teacher was told to get a certification but doesn't put it in writing and doesn't make it clear to the teacher. This guy wouldn't last two minutes in the real world--and we're paying him $250,000 to $300,000--his completely undeserved salary and his completely undeserved pension, just so he can fire our best people.
seezall
7:00 pm on Friday, June 3, 2011
last chance to see an amazing PAULA OHAUS production at hoboken high before toback and kids first (right, like that name fits them) puts the last nail in her coffin. Alice in Wonderland is friday and saturday at 7:30 and sunday at 2. it's kids frrom all the schools, not just hoboken high.
sign this petition to show your support http://www.petitiononline.com/zab26274/petition.html
many brave teachers have signed this petition, even Rachel Grygiel who patch just did a story about her award at Princeton university for being one of the best teachers in NJ. it takes one to know one, right?
franksinatra
8:57 pm on Friday, June 3, 2011
this last poster leaves out Walter Rusak in the hall of shame of villains in this terrible episode. he, along with Rose Markle and Theresa Minutillo, is the evil genius behind this vengeful effort to rip the soul out of our high school. Toback, so famous for his gullibility that people call him Mr. Turnip Truck now, is just the useful idiot, completely dominated and used by Rusak and Markle. Like all classic bullies, Rusak gets a disturbing amount of joy out of pushing people around -- people who are far smarter and more accomplished than he is but who care about power far less than he does and so are at a disadvantage against him. he's a sandbox dictator, a hack who could never make it in the real world so he lords it over the schoolchildren and young female teachers of the pretend world of public schools. and for doing so much destruction to our schools in his two years here -- don't forget, he's also booting out Cheng-Yen Hillenbrand, who built for Hoboken the largest Johns Hopkins program in the country -- we, the taxpayers, are shoveling mountains of money at him--at least $250,000 a year between his bloated salary and his bloated and undeserved pension. And last year he bullied Kids First into giving him raise! When people ask why public schools are awful across the country, people like Walter Rusak are the only answer you need.
whiteshirt
7:59 pm on Wednesday, June 15, 2011
REPOST: seezall 1:15pm on Wednesday, June 15, 2011
i thought it was a firing offense to let a student ride in a car driven by a teacher? that's one of the big crimes that toback and rusak had on paula ohaus, right?
but i guess it's ok when one of the coaches does it? this was in the sat. hoboken reporter story on buddy mathews...
"Matthews relayed a conversation he had recently with star pitcher Kenny Roder, as he was driving in his car with Roder."
What if they are broadsided by another car? that's not my questions, that's what jean marie mitchell wrote here on patch as she was attacking paula.
and let's not forget greg bond's vicious attack letter against paula... A teacher should not drive students around in their car. A teacher may disagree, but this is how teachers should conduct themselves today. A teacher may view this as interfering with their ability to establish supportive relationships with their students. But these guidelines ultimately exist to protect the students, and teachers, from uncontrolled situations. Any parent whose child was injured in an uncontrolled situation with a teacher would demand that all the parties involved take responsibility: the teacher, the School Board, the Superintendent of Schools, the School District and the State. When a parent's child is injured, it doesn't matter that a teacher was well intentioned. What matters is that the child was injured. kids first proving once again how phoney they are.