Employee Sues Hoboken Parking Utility for Sexual Harassment
A former employee of the parking utility has filed a complaint against the city.
Catherine Stewart, an employee of the Hoboken Parking Utility is suing the Hoboken Parking Utility and her supervisors there for sexual harassment, according to a complaint provided to Patch by attorney Louis Zayas' office.
Stewart is suing the city for punitive damages, but no exact money amount has been put on the suit, Zayas said.
The complaint has been filed in Superior Court in Jersey City, Zayas said. The lawyer said he is waiting for the complaint back so the city can be served with the suit. He said he expects that to happen this week.
In the suit, Stewart alleges that her supervisor, Hector Mojica, made "obscene and vulgar sexual comments" to her ever since she started work at the HPU in July, 2010. In September Mojico was promoted, which put him in direct control of Stewart's work schedule. Stewart is also suing her other supervisor, Robert Orsini.
Zayas said that Stewart is still working for the Hoboken Parking Utility and plans to stay, "unless the harassment continues."
Stewart is also suing the HPU for unlawful retaliation, negligent supervision, emotional distress as a result of the harassment and a creating a hostile work environment.
The complaint also states that Mojica's comments were also racist in nature. Stewart is an African American woman.
When Stewart turned down her supervisor's sexual advances, the complaint stated, Mojica threatened her employment and to change her shift. Stewart drove a vehicle for the Parking Utility, the complaint stated.
According to the complaint, Mojica threatened to change Stewart's shift, saying "I’ll take you out of the vehicle and put you on the street."
The complaint continued, "he would also make comments such as: 'things are going to change when I become supervisor. Certain people are going to have a hard time.'"
In October Mojica changed Stewart's shift and switched her to walking duty, the complaint stated.
"Due to Hoboken’s culture of intimidation and retaliation, Plaintiff was afraid to complain about the harassment as she feared she would face retaliation for her complaints," the complaint stated.
The complaint alleges that Director of Parking and Transportation Ian Sacs "knew or should have known of the harassment (Stewart) faced."
Sacs said he could not comment on ongoing litigation.
Mayor Dawn Zimmer said that although the city hadn't been served with the suit yet, she takes sexual harassment very seriously. She said all City Hall employees have to complete sexual harassment training and another training session is scheduled.
A meeting to discuss the alleged harassment was scheduled for a Friday in late October, but the meeting was canceled and never rescheduled, the complaint stated.
Sally McBride
3:45 pm on Tuesday, November 29, 2011
So she didn't complain, but claims Ian Sacs should have known. Does the suit explain that?
Journey
3:48 pm on Tuesday, November 29, 2011
I hope it would eventually.
How can someone know, who was not directly told?
1. Witnessed it happen (I hope not).
2. Was told by a third party.
3. Other people had similar complains, and the manager in question should have been under investigation.
Those are just off the top of my head.
Bet Mazin
4:05 pm on Tuesday, November 29, 2011
Issued a press release earlier cuz I am the grand dame of Hoboken judgement looking down on you all.
Please do a follow up and include all my salient attacks, I mean points.
Thank you, that is all.
rtrux
4:11 pm on Tuesday, November 29, 2011
anyone found guilty of these these charges should be fired. also, there's a big difference between "knew" and "should have known" of the harassment.
Eric
4:22 pm on Tuesday, November 29, 2011
If it's true good luck to her and the scumbags should be fired. Though the comment she made that Sacs should have known is odd. Is he supposed to read her mind?
friendly fire
4:57 pm on Tuesday, November 29, 2011
I'd like to know who canceled the meeting to discuss the alleged sexual harassment in late October, and never re-scheduled. If it was her, it's odd, at best. In my personal opinion, there's no way Ian Sacs ignored a complaint of sexual harassment brought to his attention. Any bet takers, I'm giving 3-1...
greenhaven
5:18 pm on Tuesday, November 29, 2011
You're right that line at the very end of the story - which I missed when I read it the first time - is extremely strange. The alleged victim says she was afraid to report anything. How did she expect anybody to help her if she didn't report it? And if she didn't report anything why was a meeting scheduled to discuss it? Did she report it or not? How could a meeting be scheduled unless something was reported. And I'm guessing that if the meeting was cancelled by the City the complaint would say so (though maybe it does - Patch could have left that out.
The story as reported makes absolutely no sense. Maybe Patch will post the actual complaint so we can tell if the problem is a complaint that makes no sense on its face or a news story that leaves out important details.
Journey
12:38 pm on Wednesday, November 30, 2011
Sadly, the quality of writing has fallen so much, even in the New York Times.
I too would like to know who called the meeting, who was to attend, who canceled it, and who was responsible for rescheduling it.
Scott Behren
11:41 am on Wednesday, November 30, 2011
For more information about your employee legal rights and sexual harassment laws, check out our employee rights blog www.taekthisjobnshoveitblog.com.
L
5:00 am on Friday, December 2, 2011
I know this woman. She is very promiscuous and sleeps around alot. I highly doubt this story is true. I am 90% sure she lied to get paid.