patching...
Welcome back, Patch Blogger!

Kids First Officially Win School Board Elections

With all the votes counted, the Kids First candidates have officially won the school board elections.

 

Mail in ballots and provisionals have not altered the outcome of the elections on November 6.

This means that the three Kids First candidates — Tom Kluepfel, Jean Marie Mitchell and incumbent Ruth McAllister — have secured their seats on the board, guaranteeing the slate's super majority on the board.

The total results, according to the Hudson County Board of Elections, are as follows:

Kluepfel: 4,259 votes

Mitchell: 4,097 votes

McAllister: 4,216 votes

The Move Forward candidates — the opposing ticket made up of Anthony Oland, Elizabeth Markevitch and Felice Vazquez — gained votes with the mail in ballots, but enough to win.

Oland: 3,499 votes

Markevitch: 4,019 votes

Vazquez: 3,481 votes.

Independent candidate Patricia Waiters got 1,284 votes.

Related Topics: Kids First, School Board Elections, and move forward

HobokenReformer

10:10 am on Thursday, November 29, 2012

Claire, things that happened 2 days ago are not news anymore. This is the 21st century where people have easy access to new information via mobile devices. If you want to become relevant as a news source, you got to get with the program and report things when they are happening, not several days later.

Reply

Hobbs

10:11 am on Thursday, November 29, 2012

Congratulations to the entire KIDS FIRST team. Well done. :-)

Reply

Andy

2:36 pm on Thursday, November 29, 2012

Congratulations - almost a month later. I'm surprised certain people in town didn't suddenly "find votes" to flip the results.

Reply
Comment_arrow

DaHorsey, SmartyJones of MSV

3:39 pm on Thursday, November 29, 2012

Don't be sure there was not an effort to muster up lots of votes to upend the election.
Today's feature on the views of some of the people on both sides of the BoE race:

http://www.hobokenhorse.com/2012/11/boe-election-rivals-weigh-in-on.html

oldguard

3:39 pm on Thursday, November 29, 2012

Where's the increased particpation because this election was held in November? With the way the vote change advocates were crowing, I would have expected at least 10,000 votes for the top vote getter. I don't think moving the elections will have the impact desired.

Reply
Comment_arrow

Journey

12:44 pm on Friday, November 30, 2012

Here are the last 5 school board election totals. Draw your own conclusion about turn out.

2012 24,900
2011 10,523
2010 9,941
2009 15,056
2008 11,215

Comment_arrow

pdq

12:44 pm on Friday, November 30, 2012

I think the impact desired was met. The intention of the move to November elections served to save money for the school board and taxpayers. Which is exactly what it has done.

Comment_arrow

mcgato

12:44 pm on Friday, November 30, 2012

This year's results are above, but 4097 votes got 3rd and a board seat.

Last year's April election results are below: 1980 votes got 3rd and a board seat.
Carmelo G. Garcia 2,296
Clifford Godfrey 1,327
Jean Marie Mitchell 1,358
Steve Feinstein 1,247
Frances Rhodes-Kearns 1,980
Patricia Waiters 278
Peter Biancamano 1,996

When there is strong evidence that certain groups can buy upwards of 500 votes by mail, plus more to show up on election day, it is easy to see why they wanted to maintain a low voter turnout. Easier to buy an election when only 2000 votes are needed to win a seat.

Comment_arrow

Ojo Rojo

12:44 pm on Friday, November 30, 2012

The winners in 2010 got something like 1,500 votes each. The winners in 2011 got closer to 1900 I believe. This election the winners got over 4,000 votes.

pdq

12:44 pm on Friday, November 30, 2012

Super majority is a non sequitur.

Reply

Leave a comment