patching...
Breaking: Sopranos Star James Gandolfini Dead at 51 »
Welcome back, Patch Blogger!

Bill to Protect Firefighters From Solar Panel Dangers Advances

Assemblyman Robert Schroeder sponsors bill requiring emblem on buildings where solar panels are attached to the roof to protect firefighters from electrocution.

 

With an increasing number of buildings investing in alternative energy, emergency responders are often unable to immediately identify structures that have installed solar panels on their roofs — putting them at risk of electrocution in the event of a fire. 

In an effort to protect firefighters against the danger of electrocution posed by solar panels, Assemblyman Robert Schroeder (R-Woodcliff Lake), a volunteer firefighter in the Township of Washington since 1980 who has twice served as fire chief, has sponsored a bill that would require buildings to clearly label with an exterior emblem whether they have solar panels.

The bipartisan bill was approved by the Assembly Homeland Security and State Preparedness Committee, on which Schroeder serves.

"New Jersey is one of the fastest-growing markets for solar energy and trails only California in terms of installations, but solar panels pose an unintended threat to firefighters," Schroeder said last week.

"Safe firefighting requires knowledge and awareness of the situation. This bill will let emergency responders know at a glance when there's a threat of electrocution because the building is actively harnessing power from the sun."

The safety measure was recommended in a National Fire Protection Association report focusing on structural firefighting in buildings that utilize solar panels to generate thermal and/or electrical energy.

According to the report, buildings with solar power systems "can present a variety of significant hazards" for firefighters.  

In addition, the bill requires that all existing and newly constructed buildings with solar panels be equipped with an external shut-off switch. 

"We can have clean reliable energy without making fires any more dangerous than they already are," said Schroeder.

"As a firefighter, I understand the value of knowing immediately what potential dangers await in a burning building I might have to enter."

"Simply putting a warning sign on the outside of a building could very well save the life of one of our brave first responders," Schroeder said. 

Related Topics: Bill A-266, Fire fighter safety, Patch's House & Home, Real Estate, Robert Schroeder, Solar Panels, and Solar panel emblem

Jeffrey DelVecchio

6:12 am on Tuesday, March 13, 2012

As a homeowner with 45 solar panels on my roof and a former volunteer firefighter, I think this is a very good idea. I have considered offering my home to the New Milford Fire Department for training so they can see first hand how a solar electric system functions.

Reply

Marv

12:35 pm on Tuesday, March 13, 2012

We know that ethenol forces up the price of food. Subsidies to solar and others raise the price of our utility bills. Florescent "energy saving bulbs" pose health and disposal risks, and solar panels can electricute fire fighters. Did anyone think through these things ahead of time. And an elderly native American in Minnesota told me the wildmills are ugly and kill birds. He would rather have nuclear.

Reply
Comment_arrow

David Harrison

3:58 pm on Tuesday, March 13, 2012

Every conventional or alternative energy source has drawbacks and risks, except perhaps geothermal. If it were that simple we wouldn't have energy or related environmental issues. Did anyone think these things through? Of course. Engineers are generally smart people, but sometimes there are unforeseen consequences. Re. Compact Fluorescent bulbs, the amount of mercury contained has been significantly decreased since these were introduced, to the point where only an infant in the immediate vicinity of a breakage would be at risk, per the EPA. Spent bulbs may be disposed of properly, for recycling, at the Millburn DPW yard or any Home Depot.

Comment_arrow

Maurice Marvi

9:39 am on Thursday, March 15, 2012

Your Native American Minnesotan may be right about ugly, but is mistaken that wind turbines kill birds in great numbers. During a tour of the wind generating facility outside of Atlantic City, I was shown data about bird deaths at the site for the preceding years. Of the bird carcasses found on the site, none showed signs of trauma that would indicate a rotor strike.

While the study was done by the owners of the facility, who may have a conflict of interest, it had been vetted by an independent third party.

If you want to see bird destruction, walk around the base of a tall building just after sunrise. I believe that the Port Authority had a dedicated bird carcass cleanup crew do the rounds each morning.of the WTC towers.

Comment_arrow

Rob Burke

10:25 am on Thursday, March 15, 2012

Maurice - I am aware of the death of one bird in AC - tragically, it was an osprey. However, don't fool yourself into thinking that coal, nat gas & nukes haven't killed birds, humans and had other negative consequences.

Comment_arrow

Maurice Marvi

12:52 pm on Thursday, March 15, 2012

Mr Burke

Anything we do has consequences,. However, to quote W. L. Watkinson:
"It is better to light a single candle than to curse the darkness"

The funny thing, is I was first introduced to that quote by Charles Schultz in Peanuts.

Comment_arrow

Rob Burke

1:38 pm on Thursday, March 15, 2012

You're absolutely right, Maurice. Its quite ease for folks to attack some form of energy without considering that they must get their energy from some source(s) -- and there is no energy source that doesn't have consequences that we'd all rather do without. In my view, our energy future must combine a wide variety of resources to meet our needs in a balanced way. There will be a place for coal and for natural gas as there will be a place for nuclear, solar, wind, hydro and geothermal. None of these though will be so abundant or so uniquely positive & without drawbacks such that it can meet our needs all by itself. The answer will be 'all of the above.'

Bruce Knuckle

1:58 pm on Tuesday, March 13, 2012

Gimme a break. A little placard is gonna be better than those giant solar panels? Education is needed, not another bill. Next will be the registration fees towns collect. Question to the assemblyman: Should we put a sign up letting them know objects in the burning building might be hot to the touch?

Reply
Comment_arrow

Jeffrey DelVecchio

2:59 pm on Tuesday, March 13, 2012

There are already signs on solar installations alerting utility workers of an alternate power source. What is the harm in another sign? Not all installations are visable from the road. How would you like to be on the wrong end of a live 500+ Volt live wire? Unfortunately we live in a day when people don't always do the right thing just because it is the right thing. Some people need a little nudging. For instance, it makes perfect sense to dig out the fire hydrant in front of your house but how many people actually do it? I do.

Comment_arrow

Dan C

1:13 am on Saturday, March 17, 2012

Actually, those "little placards" identifying truss floors and roofs, and if this bill passes, solar panels, are exactly what we (firefighters) look for as we approach a building. They identify SPECIFIC risks that a specific building poses that are not found on the majority of buildings. Solar panels are often only on one side of a building, and as such, may not be visible to firefighters as we come on scene. A sign that costs maybe $10 dollars could save a firefighters life... Don't you think that it worth the money?

RTD

3:05 pm on Tuesday, March 13, 2012

Research the subject knuckle before you open your mouth. Cutting the power to the panels does not ensure it is safe to operate around them. The placard, like a placard for a building with truss roof or floors, is an indicator for firefighters before even entering the building. There's a ton of research material available online and through pse&g on the dangers of solar panels. While I do agree with alternative means of energy, not to the demise of human life. This is a huge step in firefighter safety.

Reply

I.Gotta.Get.Outta.Here

5:25 pm on Tuesday, March 13, 2012

With all these inherent dangers a person would be crazy to volunteer ..time dor a county wide fire department that is paid! Tbe biggest danger is the blue lighters driving like mario andretti to get to calls

Reply
Comment_arrow

SPF Resident

6:04 pm on Tuesday, March 13, 2012

Seriously? I don't think you would want to wait up to 30 minutes or more for a response to your house burning down.

Comment_arrow

brad

10:04 am on Wednesday, March 14, 2012

i don't know where ur from gotta.get. outta.here. i as a vonlunteer and many of my fellow firefighters do not drive like Mario Andretti, what good would we be to the homeowners house if we crashed

Comment_arrow

Chris Antonelli

10:35 am on Wednesday, March 14, 2012

If they were paid, they'd already be in the firehouse. No need to go there when you're being paid to be there.

Comment_arrow

bill kenney

5:57 pm on Wednesday, March 14, 2012

better hope your family doesn't have an emergency requiring fire or ems! You'd eat those words for the rest of your life if a member of your family died as a result of the blue lighters not getting there in time to save them.
Do you have a life???
I have 2/3+ of my life,professional and volunteer fire service. Shame on you!!

Comment_arrow

Dan C

1:19 am on Saturday, March 17, 2012

Hey Chris, You do realize that in our town, there has not been an incident of a volunteer causing an accident since the 80's, right? And do you want to pay more taxes for a paid fire company? If you do, I will be the first to sign up to be a paid firefighter in Basking Ridge. We volunteer our time to save your life and the lives of your family, friends and neighbors... Maybe a little respect is in order...

Bruce Knuckle

5:34 pm on Tuesday, March 13, 2012

RTD, Thanks for pausing Backdraft to give me the lesson. No doubt in my mind, that once it is a law, towns will use it to make revenue by charging registration fees and creating fines. Hey Jeffrey, most people dont care. If they did , you wouldnt hear of them disabling smoke detectors. Searching for victims, certainly injurs or kills many more FF's than solar panels.

Reply
Comment_arrow

Tommy P

5:42 pm on Tuesday, March 13, 2012

Federal Law preempts taxing it, a registration fee would be de facto tax. I am sure Metlzer thought about that one, and if he didn't, stop giving him ideas.

Comment_arrow

Bruce Knuckle

6:47 pm on Tuesday, March 13, 2012

You got it Thomas. What was I thinking

Mikey

5:38 pm on Tuesday, March 13, 2012

The "blue lighters" may save your ungrateful hide someday. If you are jealous then volunteer, you can get a blue light too.

Reply
Comment_arrow

Bruce Knuckle

6:45 pm on Tuesday, March 13, 2012

Mikey, the strobes are hurting your brain

Mary Mann

8:14 pm on Tuesday, March 13, 2012

No personal attacks, please. Those comments will be deleted. Let's stick to the issues.

Reply
Comment_arrow

Bruce Knuckle

9:24 pm on Tuesday, March 13, 2012

MaryMann, I just took a look at your Maplewood patch. Seems your censorship of that page might be the reason for such a low number of bloggers posting there. I believe you were too quick removing some of the posts here.

Comment_arrow

ref

6:59 am on Wednesday, March 14, 2012

What happened to "Feedom of speach" nice to have an eraser for what you don,t like

Ginger

8:26 pm on Tuesday, March 13, 2012

So now we need a marking to make sure firefighters know that there are solar panels? It isn't obvious enough that there are massive solar panels on the roof? Why don't we just label the two-story houses while we're at it...

Reply
Comment_arrow

Lurky Loo

8:39 pm on Tuesday, March 13, 2012

No, not always. If they are on your back roof and it were in the middle of the night, you would never know there were panels up there.

Comment_arrow

Bruce Knuckle

9:20 pm on Tuesday, March 13, 2012

LurkyLoo.....I pray for you if your officers do not look around back at a scene. Give a reason, not an excuse.

Comment_arrow

Lurky Loo

7:49 am on Wednesday, March 14, 2012

I don't hear people complain about putting a tot finder sticker on your childrens window, what is the big deal about putting a sticker on your window indicating solar power?? You'll have VOLUNTEER firemen risk their lives for your pets and kids but won't put up a simple sticker to let them know they may electrocute themselves on your solar panels?? Asinine!

Comment_arrow

JenniferB

9:23 am on Wednesday, March 14, 2012

I was wondering about the Tot stickers? Do firemen look for them? Growing up I use to see a lot of them but not so much anymore. Wouldn't the adhesive melt as well and they would just shrivel up?

still in town 78

8:38 pm on Tuesday, March 13, 2012

Our all VOLUNTEER fire department and first aid squad VOLUNTEER their time energy and money too VOLUNTEER in this town and many others, with the Wayne VOLUNTEER fire department being one of the busiest in the country. They do a whole lot with little and people have no problem when they come to help you or your family members in their time of need. I think asking someone who has solar panels on their property to put a little placard up is not a big deal. VOLUNTEERS is what keeps your property taxes lower then what they would be if it were a paid dept.

Reply
Comment_arrow

Bruce Knuckle

9:16 pm on Tuesday, March 13, 2012

We ask them to use smoke detectors too and they dont. Its not the sign, its the law that comes with it.

Comment_arrow

Lois Bloom

12:05 am on Wednesday, March 14, 2012

That says it all! Thank you still in town 78.

still in town 78

8:41 pm on Tuesday, March 13, 2012

What about solar panels on the roof of multiple story building. Where the roofs are generally flat and cant be seen from the street. Its not so much the panels themselves as much as it is that their maybe power still in the building after the public utilities turns off the power from the street. Its a safety issue.

Reply

Bruce Knuckle

9:18 pm on Tuesday, March 13, 2012

Still in town 78...And where are these panel shut off's located? And I disagree. Its not a safety issue, its an education issue.

Reply
Comment_arrow

Douglas Bradley Haber

9:22 pm on Tuesday, March 13, 2012

"Bruce",

I am in agreement in part. Education is an issue, but so is safety. I'd love for you to point out solar panels when a roof is starting to cave in, or there is so much smoke you can't see the roof

I'm not a FF so I don't have experience with it; however, anything to help promote safety in some way, shape, or form I am 100% for.

Comment_arrow

Ginger

10:01 pm on Tuesday, March 13, 2012

Douglas: If you can't identify a solar panel because the roof is caved in or there is too much smoke, what makes you think it's going to be any easier finding a small placard?

Big Ben

10:13 pm on Tuesday, March 13, 2012

That's the argument that the police always use. We need more officers, more superior officers, more fire power, higher salaries, more benefits, more this, more that - it's all needed to keep you safe.

Reply

Jacj Mahoffer

11:11 pm on Tuesday, March 13, 2012

" Bare Knuckle " , as he calls himself, has NEVER faced a situation in his LIFE that required courage or guts. Without knowing him at all, I KNOW it !!!! He sits in a cubicle making 50K, and craps on those who do things he has no courage to do. " Bare Knuckle " wants you to think he is a cage fighter !!!!. He would run from an unruley candle !!!!

Reply
Comment_arrow

Bruce Knuckle

7:38 am on Wednesday, March 14, 2012

JM....How many belt buckles do you have bestowing your bravery? Your post doesnt speak to the issue.

Ulises

12:21 am on Wednesday, March 14, 2012

Benjamin Franklin created the first volunteer fire department in America. He new how important it was for communities to band together and save neighbors in harm's way... Today, we take for granted all we have and hearing all this negative banter about such a positive law is, frankly, pathetic.

Reply

Ilir Bitici

2:01 am on Wednesday, March 14, 2012

Maybe if the fire dept. coordinated with the building dept. they would have a file on exactly what structures have solar. The place card is stupid, is it fire proof or somthing? Why would it not burn in the fire the building is burning in? A bad idea and a cheap way to tax the people.

Reply

Rob Burke

9:55 am on Wednesday, March 14, 2012

The Bill's requirement that all solar panel equipped buildings have an external shut off switch is superfluous, I think. Not positive, but I believe that's already required by law -- both my house and my business have solar panels and both have external shut off switches.

As far as an emblem designating that the building has solar panels is concerned, I don't have a problem displaying such an emblem on either my house or my business. I prefer not to pay some ridiculous sum of money for a sticker to any branch of government -- I already write checks for thousands of dollars annually for permits and inspections that are unnecessary.

That said, lots of folks who have panels are proud of them and would like to draw attention to them, just like becoming a LEED Certified building is a highly prized achievement that architects, builders and owners like to brag about. A sticker would be a positive for lots of solar panel owners.

And if the sticker saves one life of one firefighter, its value is priceless.

Just don't make me pay $1,000 for it...

Reply

Tom Tom, the piper's son

10:25 am on Wednesday, March 14, 2012

Rob is right. The bill is quite superfluous. In order for the solar system to pass inspection from a building department it must have both clear markers on the panel AND it has to have an outside accessible shut off. If you want to see what one looks like, here's mine: http://oi41.tinypic.com/a0ufsm.jpg
Like Rob, I too am not adverse to a sticker if it helps to save a life. But don't make me pay for it.
Our buildings are already safer because of solar. Not all residences have outdoor emergency disconnects like ours. Shutting this down will not only disengage the solar array, but also disconnects the house from the grid - which makes it more safe for combating fires. B
Laws like this waste tax payer money because they are redundant laws. Spinning government's wheels to create a feel-good law is a waste of time and money.

Reply

Ulises

11:40 am on Wednesday, March 14, 2012

HobokenOwl,

It's really Odysseus in Greek, Ulysses in English and Ulises, which is my real name, is the Latin translation since my parents are of Cuban/Spanish heritage. Sorry about the typo and thank you for your comment.

Reply
Comment_arrow

es

12:53 pm on Wednesday, March 14, 2012

If your parents named you for the Latin Ulises, or Roman Ulixes, they really put a heavy burden on your shoulders. Virgil did not have very nice things to say about Ulixes in "The Aeneid," but to the Greeks, a legend. It's all about your perspective in life.

Jeffrey DelVecchio

12:39 pm on Wednesday, March 14, 2012

While the shut off is helpful it does not shut the panels off it only stops power at the inverters. There is at least 20 feet of wire between my roof and the shut off that will be hot as long as the sun is shining on the panels. Also, any work being done on the roof would be before the shut off as well. Like it or not, we need laws to protect people because people as a whole don't always do the right thing.

Reply

Bruce Knuckle

1:43 pm on Wednesday, March 14, 2012

Lurkyloo, cant quite comprehend what your reading eh? I'm for the tot finder stickers because they were not mandated, its optional. And btw, how many people take them off the windows when the kids are grown? I can answer that, close to none of them. So according to your logic, lets post a bill making it illegal to leave TOT finders up after your TOT's are grown up an gone. If it save one FF from climbing through the wrong window it will be worth it ...right?

Reply
Comment_arrow

Lurky Loo

2:09 pm on Wednesday, March 14, 2012

I comprehend just fine. I would rather see our VOLUNTEER firemen safe when answering a call so if you just can't stand a law requiring a simple sticker, well then heres a simple enough answer for you Bruce. Don't get solar panels and you won't have to get a sticker! So glad thats settled! Moving on...

Ulises

1:53 pm on Wednesday, March 14, 2012

es, it's only a name (my dad was a fan of the Oddessey). Let's keep the discussion on the article's topic which I feel is a step in the right direction. Mr. DelVecchio made some valid points on why this is a good thing.

Reply

still in town 78

2:51 pm on Wednesday, March 14, 2012

If the new law requires1000$ to purchase the sticker/placard. Thats crazy I you should be able to purchase through a hardware store the installation company, whatever. It should not be a money maker it is a safety issue. P.s. the new tot finder stickers go on the inside door not on the outside thats why you don't see as many.

Reply
Comment_arrow

Lurky Loo

5:02 pm on Wednesday, March 14, 2012

I couldn't find one article that said these stickers would cost $1000. Could someone please post a link to that info??

Bruce Knuckle

6:12 pm on Wednesday, March 14, 2012

LurkyLoo, I'm not the one all scared of solar panels, nor am I the one trying the scare tactics to improve revenue.

Reply

Maurice Marvi

9:28 am on Thursday, March 15, 2012

Most Fire Fighters are trained specifically on how to handle electrical hazards, whether they are from Utility power or or something self generated.

If a fire is big enough that will require a hose line that may lead to some kind of electrocution hazard along the water stream, fire departments do a "Size Up" on site before entering to make sure that the roof structure is not compromised. That will also bring to their attention any solar installations on the roof. If it is a large industrial complex with a flat roof and Parapets, this may not happen. However, for these structures, the local FD will hopefully have already performed a “Pre-Plan” as typically recommended by corporate Risk Management, or their insurance companies.

Of course, at night, smaller residential installations may be missed in the hectic first minutes of a response, but then, at night, these systems do not generate any electrical power.

Now, after the October Snowstorm, we have many neighbors who have had automatic fuel fired emergency generators installed. We probably also have neighbors who may also have significantly sized battery backup systems in place. Both of these create significant hazards for our responding firemen. Especially the potential energy hazards in stored fuel, and charged batteries.

Reply
Comment_arrow

Maurice Marvi

9:28 am on Thursday, March 15, 2012

How do we handle it? A sticker seems useless. Of the firemen I have met, None of them care about the Totfinder. Upon responding They will search an entire residence. This include closets and under beads, favorite hiding places of scared children. Even the MVC stopped using stickers for vehicle registration.

One common point is that any of these installations will have required an inspection and permit by the building department. We can best equip our firefighters by giving them ready access to building department information. This can either be a portable database of the building department files available on the responding vehicles, or a fixed version at the dispatch that can be used to inform or alert the responders of the out of the ordinary hazards in any building.

Robert Steelman

10:28 am on Thursday, March 15, 2012

Please check your calendars, spring forward to 2012. Revenue generating safety signage on buildings as a first line of defense is outdated. Commercial buildings are complex and solar is one more issue to address. The solution should reflect available technology to capture relevant information and make it available for crisis and non-crisis use. Ancient bureaucratic thinking is only good for burning more tax dollars and keeping low-wattage paper pushers on the payroll.

Reply

Don

9:41 pm on Friday, March 16, 2012

It all depends on how many panels are wired in series. They can be wired either series or parallel. A typical PV system is wired to put out only 12-15 volts - but many can deliver a large amount of current in amps at full load which can heat up a wire to become very hot very quickly if its shorted. but 15 volts is not enough to shock someone seriously - unless they are also covered with salty water.. not fresh water. However, when PV panels are in series, then voltages do get much higher. Putting them in series reduces transmission losses in a given size of wire.

Also when they are not charging something the voltage can and does get higher also.

" I = \frac{V}{R}

where I is the current through the conductor in units of amperes, V is the potential difference measured across the conductor in units of volts, and R is the resistance of the conductor in units of ohms. The R in this relation is constant, independent of the current."

Some kinds of R increase as current increases, like the filament in a light bulb - or a shorted wire, as it heats up.

Reply
Comment_arrow

Jeffrey DelVecchio

10:00 pm on Friday, March 16, 2012

I have to disagree with you here. Grid tied PV systems, the most common, are wired in series and output over 400 Volts DC. Battery backup off grid systems are wired at 48 Volts. One of my panels alone puts out over 50 Volts and over 200 Watts.

Comment_arrow

Don

11:06 pm on Friday, March 16, 2012

Jeffrey, I don't think that what I said contradicts that as much as our ideas of typical is different. PV systems have also gotten larger.

You have a large system with lots of panels wired in *series*. Some folks with these huge panel setups can run stuff like a freezer or a washer dryer or maybe even your entire house off of it.

(BTW, thats definitely a good way to go.)

But since individual silicon PV wafers only put out a fraction of a volt, its all in how they are wired. Often they are wired in combinations of series and parallel.

Comment_arrow

Jeffrey DelVecchio

9:32 am on Saturday, March 17, 2012

These large whole house systems such as mine are what the law is aimed at. I also have a small system in my backyard that only puts out 24 Volts. That system is not a hazard, the system on my roof is. Firefighters are taught to shut off utilities during a fire. That usually entails shutting off the main breaker and gas valve. At my house they should also turn off the PV system at the inverters. Even after that is done, the wires from the panels to the inverters will still be live if the sun is shining.

Don

10:10 pm on Friday, March 16, 2012

There is a very useful but totally underutilized form of geothermal available to everybody that could save most of us a lot of money. Its also quite simple. Its done by simply burying a long length of PVC piping a few feet underground, (some just serve to cool or warm air, others contain water..or antifreeze..)

The buried pipes tap the "energy of the earth"energy we rarely think much about.. They can serve as a pre-warmer or pre-cooler for fresh air coming into a home (where it can be used as part of a passive house setup.) or they can be part of a heat exchanger.. The average temperature around five feet underground is constant that varies very little year round. (Thats why cave homes often make a lot of sense in some climates)

So in the winter it saves on heating and in the summer it saves on cooling. All you need to do is heat your house the very few degrees above the year round average in the winter and cool it just a little more than the ground already cools it in the summer.. Very low tech high tech that works.

Reply

Don

11:17 pm on Friday, March 16, 2012

The unfortunate fact of the recent subsidies for "green jobs" is that thanks to WTO regulations against discrimination - most of that grant money created jobs in other countries, where the innovation these days is happening, unfortunately.

If we want things like grants to American businesses so we can catch up to be WTO-legal, we need to pull out or renegotiate these so called "free trade agreements" which would (if it wasn't impossible, because nation-state politicians simply do not have the power to do that, these treaties supersede national laws) seem hypocritical because American companies are the ones who wrote them- and used them to break into profitable emergent markets decades ago.) For the same reason, basically, all the advances we need in health care and soon, education will be WTO-illegal. Its called the "ratchet effect" ratcheting in privatization. We need more engineers, even if its not as porofitable as law or medicine now, it is smart. Law and medicine are the next frontier of globalization. "Seeing" a doctor in India or a lawyer in China via telepresence tools will be routine in a decade, Google "GATS".

Reply

Dan C

1:32 am on Saturday, March 17, 2012

Wow, some of these posts make me sick... As a volunteer I though we had the support of the community... I am sickened by the comments made by some of the people here. You are the same people that call us when the S*** hits the fan, but when we ask for something as simple as a placard or a sticker, it is too much to ask... How about asking us to get up and leave our families (without ANY pay) with the possibility of never returning, just to help a total stranger that may not even care if we die... Sure glad there are at least some people defending the heroes in this town...

Reply

Ken

9:51 am on Saturday, March 17, 2012

Good lord, y'all are seriously arguing AGAINST such a common-sense provision? First of all, the obvious place for the sticker would be near the external meter, where the electrical service enters the house: it's extremely likely that the source of the fire the FD would be responding to would be somewhere else, like your kitchen, and not at the panel itself; the sticker isn't going to burn, because the piece of metal isn't going to be on fire or close to fire.

As dozens of people have noted, slanted roofs have two sides, and you can't see what's on top of the back side from the front; you also can't see what's on top of the front one if you're too close to it.

It's extremely difficult for me to believe that among the relatively few people with solar panels on their roofs, there would be several of them in a Patch thread, arguing on and on about everything that's wrong with this simple protective idea -- or that anyone with such an inherent firefighting hazard on their property would be opposed to such a warning.

Some of you should be ashamed.

Reply

WTFF38

6:58 pm on Tuesday, March 20, 2012

As a volunteer firefighter for Washington Township I am disgusted at what I am reading. The fact that people are complaining about a sticker to warn firefighters that the house is equipped with solar panels is crazy. Ever been on a roof with fire and smoke? You can't see much as it is, so how are we going to see a panel that is designed to blend in with the existing roof so it looks "pretty". I'd like to pull up to a fire and see the sign before I step off the truck. Also disconnecting the power from the box does not ensure the panels have no power. The only way to completely turn the panels off is to put a special tarp to keep sun light out.
In addition the issue with the blue lights is off topic and is irrelevant. As volunteers we have to travel across town to get to the fire stations, we don’t live there. They should not exceed the speed limit ever but every second counts including drivers pulling to the side of the road letting us pass. I'll leave you with a final thought, it is an unpaid profession. We leave our family during dinner, work or school all to keep our neighbors safe. Next time you see us pass by remember we could be going to your house.

Reply

Chris Hansen

5:37 pm on Thursday, April 19, 2012

WTFF38 You make some interesting, thoughtful points. There may be a story here.

Reply

zizi

12:52 pm on Thursday, September 6, 2012

We don't have such problems in Teaneck...... We pay our firefighters and police personal.

Reply
Comment_arrow

Tom Tom, the piper's son

4:32 pm on Thursday, September 6, 2012

Zizi, you should pay your grammar instructors better.

kikidistiles

10:58 am on Monday, March 25, 2013

Thanks for sharing, I really should talk to my pastor about getting <a href="http://www.islandwidesolar.com/residential.php">solar panels in Honolulu</a> for out church. It may save him lots of money.

Reply

Leave a comment